<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://stage.nitrcce.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://stage.nitrcce.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=317" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://stage.nitrcce.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC Task Independent Fluctuations Discussion Forum: help</title>
  <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=317</link>
  <description>Get Public Help</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 7:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
  <item>
   <title>RE: help with functional connectivity analysi</title>
   <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=560&amp;forum_id=317</link>
   <description>I just noticed your question. I was monitoring the open discussion, but not the &amp;quot;help&amp;quot; forum. Now I'm looking at both. If you still need an answer, I can write more.</description>
   <author>Daniel Handwerker</author>
   <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=560&amp;forum_id=317</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>help with functional connectivity analysis</title>
   <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=560&amp;forum_id=317</link>
   <description>hi everyone,&lt;br /&gt;
i'm doing a resting state functional connectivity analysis and am seeking expert advice.  i'm happy with my pre-processing, but have a question about the analysis itself.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is there anything wrong with simply entering my seed timecourse as a regressor in spm at the first level of analysis, and then entering the resulting contrast images into a second level RFX t test?  this has been done before (e.g. Waites et al 2006 Ann Neurol; 59:335-43), but i encountered skepticism about this approach at hbm last month.      is it a valid method of measuring functional connectivity, or do i need to do the more commonly done correlation with Fisher z transform?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
any help would be greatly appreciated,&lt;br /&gt;
nick bradfield</description>
   <author>Nick Bradfield</author>
   <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 7:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=560&amp;forum_id=317</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Welcome to Help</title>
   <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=288&amp;forum_id=317</link>
   <description>Welcome to Help</description>
   <author>Christian Haselgrove</author>
   <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=288&amp;forum_id=317</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
