<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://stage.nitrcce.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://stage.nitrcce.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=4107" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://stage.nitrcce.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC MISST - Microstructure Imaging Sequence Simulation ToolBox Forum: open-discussion</title>
  <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4107</link>
  <description>General Discussion</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 3:17:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
  <item>
   <title>RE: A minor bug</title>
   <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=10287&amp;forum_id=4107</link>
   <description>Dear Ricardo,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you so much for noticing this. I apologise for replying so late, I was changing labs over the summer and I haven't been following this space :)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad you had a workaround and solved the issue, I will fix it in the code soon as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general, if a waveform looks as you expect when you plot it and the sum of the gradients is zero (I assume the designed gradients are balanced) then it is likely correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm really happy you found the toolbox useful! Please let me know if you have any other questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best,&lt;br /&gt;
Andrada</description>
   <author>Andrada Ianus</author>
   <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=10287&amp;forum_id=4107</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>A minor bug</title>
   <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=10287&amp;forum_id=4107</link>
   <description>Hi! I have been using this toolbox for simulating DW-MRI signals with oscillate gradients with compartments that try to sitmulate axonal loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been trying stuff like your papers to see if i can get a reasonable parameter configuration to use in our 7T Bruker scanner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing is when I was trying to simulate TWOGSE gradients I found a little mistake with the wave_form.m function: There are some cases that you can get to line 281 without the [b]i_smalldel[/b] variable defined before this point, resulting in a matlab error. I just added:&lt;br /&gt;
[b]i_smalldel = i;[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
[b]i_delta = i_smalldel;[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
after line 254 to workaround this error. It looks like it works but not sure if it is the right thing to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just wanted to report this. Thank you for the toolbox I have been learning a lot thanks to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greeting from México!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ricardo Rios</description>
   <author>Ricardo Alonso Rios Carrillo</author>
   <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=10287&amp;forum_id=4107</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Welcome to Open-Discussion</title>
   <link>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=4503&amp;forum_id=4107</link>
   <description>Welcome to Open-Discussion</description>
   <author>Andrada Ianus</author>
   <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 17:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://stage.nitrcce.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=4503&amp;forum_id=4107</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
